Posted by jameswdcrawford on January 30, 2010 under PR |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxvrRggOQjo
(gratuitous opportunity to show Moscow penalty miss)
The John Terry super injunction story is more proof that celebrities or organisations should turn to PR professionals and not lawyers when dealing with a media crisis. Only public relations professionals have the tools to ensure that a story such as this one can be kept under control.
A super injunction can work, sure. However there is no plan B.
Once the injunction is made public, what was a negative story is amplified tenfold. The whole affair seems more sordid. He is now on the front of five national newspapers. This is a massive fail, nearly on the same proportions of his penalty miss in Moscow (Viva John Terry – bit of Man Utd gloating there…).
Of course PR isn’t 100 per cent fool proof, far from it, but media relations would have been a better strategy, rather than litigation. John’s PR consultant could have negotiated and traded other content, tried to kill the story and prove it to be incorrect, or managed the story, so the coverage was minimised.
Most people wouldn’t be that surprised about John Terry behaving this way, so really taken on its own the story of a footballer trying to impregnate someone is fish and chip paper. We’ve already seen him urinating in bars, fighting and taking cash in hand payments from journalists for tours of the Chelsea training ground. So really this story is not that newsworthy. John has made it newsworthy, thanks to his legal advice.
Tags: Crisis Communications, Crisis PR, John Terry, Lawyer, Legal, Manchester, Manchester United, Media Relations, MUFC, PR, Public Relations, super injunction
Posted by jameswdcrawford on December 22, 2009 under PR |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4DT3tQqgRM
PR crisis communications is never dull. It is the part of the job that most public relations consultants love, because handling an issue can become a roller coaster ride and practitioners never know what type of crisis they might be presented with. Over the years I’ve worked on my fair share of crises – from date rape to ‘poo’ in swimming pools – and this video illustrates the variety of problems that can come your way.
This video is an interesting case study. The question is whether this video is a media relations opportunity or a threat.
On the face of it this video is obviously of a negative tone and therefore a threat. However when dealing with any crisis one must recognise that coverage of this nature is part of a wider narrative, and like any story there will be twists and turns along the way, and what was an isolated issue can be turned into something positive, or it can morph into something, much, much worse.
The test will be how Hewlett Packard handles and responds to the video. I am sure there is a very simple explanation, such as the fault being a one off technical error. Whatever happens, I am sure their handling of the issue will win them friends in the long run as HP are a good, solid company with an excellent track records.
I’ll be keeping an eye out for their response. Good luck to them! The first response I can find is here on Wired.com . Maybe that will be the end of the matter?
(hat tip to http://twitter.com/PRtweets/ )
Tags: Computer, Crisis Communications, Crisis PR, Hewlett Packard, HP, Manchester, Public Relations, Racist, Social Media, You Tube, YouTube
Posted by jameswdcrawford on October 29, 2009 under Opinion |
The Football Association needs a PR campaign to show that hooliganism is no longer a big problem in England.
The reason for my post is that this story of the Italian FA telling Capello that “Hooligan is an English word” annoyed me today.
England has an issue with its reputation abroad, one that is no longer based on fact, but rather folklore.
With such strong, negative and ingrained perceptions of British fans there is a clear task for the Public Relations Industry. This is because unbalanced reporting leads to disproportionate levels of coverage, that then informs international football fans and organisations worldwide. It becomes a vicious circle.
The facts need communicating:
- England is the safest place to watch football (there is lots of evidence to back this claim up)
- France, Italy and Spain is a far more dangerous place to watch football
- France has ancient stadia with hooligans aplenty, as does Italy
- Spain has the added joy of racism to throw into the mix, click here
OK, here is my caveat, this season there has been more trouble than usual in the UK, e.g. Man Utd v Barnsley, West Ham vs Millwall, and England can’t take its eye off the ball, but look at this more severe example which happened this week in France at a match between Marseille and Paris SG. In my view it was under-reported, see here:
Events such as what happened in Marseille are a regular occurrence in France, but just aren’t reported worldwide, compared to when we Brits get involved. This lack of balance needs addressing. I just want to see us all up to necks in the same problem without other countries missing out on the criticism.
35 Italians died in a horrific incident involving Liverpool FC hooligans, yet during the war millions of human beings died. However we can forgive the nations involved in those war-crimes, so why not the same with sport?
Could the Football Association create a crisis management strategy which kicks into action every time there is trouble in the UK or the rest of Europe? Maybe it already has a crisis PR team but clearly more needs investing in improving our reputation. When trouble is severe then the FA will rightfully hold its hands up! However robust efforts must be made to put hooliganism into perspective when compared to what happens in mainland Europe. OK, we need to stamp the problem out here, but reporting of events in Spain, England, and Italy must be proportional on a global level.
Tags: CNN, Crisis PR, FIFA, Football, Football Association, France, Hooliganism, Italy, Manchester United, Media, Opinion, PR, Public Relations, Racism, Spain, The Times, UEFA
Posted by jameswdcrawford on October 8, 2009 under PR |
I’ve been following the Ralph Lauren advertisement scandal (see previous post: http://jameswdcrawford.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/ralph-laurens-pr-argument-is-a-little-thin/) and today on Boing Boing the following statement appeared:
On Thursday, Polo Ralph Lauren released the following statement about the retouched ad: “For over 42 years we have built a brand based on quality and integrity. After further investigation, we have learned that we are responsible for the poor imaging and retouching that resulted in a very distorted image of a woman’s body. We have addressed the problem and going forward will take every precaution to ensure that the caliber of our artwork represents our brand appropriately.”
Has Ralph’s PR department done enough?

Posted by jameswdcrawford on October 7, 2009 under PR |
Ralph Lauren and blog BoingBoing.net are today at each other’s throats over images used by the fashion brand showing a rather skinny looking model.
The image, Boing Boing claims, has been touched up in photoshop and today on the blog another picture was published showing how a graphic designer had “unworked” the advert to show a healthy looking woman.

Read about it here:
http://craphound.com/10-2-09LettertoPriorityColoinrePRLInfringement.pdf
So assuming Ralph Lauren is in the wrong, what can it do to halt the damage to its reputation? (note I say assuming, but it looks pretty certain that this woman is not this shape through exercise alone!)
- Speed is of the essence. Deal with the problem and deal with it quickly before it gets worse. Ralph Lauren can’t stop the story getting out but it can halt interest in it.
- Get to the bottom of what really happened.
- Provide a statement accepting that Ralph Lauren made a mistake. (We all make errors!)
- Show some humanity. Perhaps try ‘empathy’… Show that Ralph Lauren understands the damage anorexia and bulimia causes.
- Demonstrate that this is a one off incident. (make sure it is first)
- Demonstrate commitment to an anorexia charity and / or create company guidelines on the manipulation of digital imagery. This can’t be tokenistic, so be generous.
- Follow up the crisis a month later with media relations to show that Ralph Lauren “meant business” when the fashion brand said this wouldn’t happen again
- Continue to be proactive on the topic of eating disorders, photoshop distortions, and skinny models
(I’ve assumed that Ralph Lauren have got all the basics in place. E.g. a crisis trained spokesperson, a crisis manual has been prepared prior to this event, media monitoring is in place and an international network of PR agencies is ready to support the brand)
Tags: anorexia, Blog, Boing Boing, bulimia, Crisis Communications, Crisis PR, http://www.Boingboing.net, Lawyer, Legal, Media, Model, PR, Public Relations, Ralph Lauren